Tensions between Iran and the United States continue as Iran dismisses rumors of an impending major agreement, citing unresolved issues despite some progress in negotiations. Foreign ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei noted that while both parties have reached a consensus on various points, a final deal is not yet within reach. He attributed delays in the process to mixed messages from Washington and interference from Israel.
A significant aspect of the discussions is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz for commercial shipping. Iran has clarified that it does not intend to impose tolls on maritime traffic but may introduce charges for navigational and environmental protection services, in partnership with Oman. Additionally, Iran is firm that any agreement must include a ceasefire in Lebanon and the lifting of restrictions on Iranian ports and shipping activities.
Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described the ongoing discussions as substantial, with the framework including a 30-day window following a ceasefire for Iran to clear mines from the Strait of Hormuz, ensuring full maritime access. However, the US military has confirmed conducting strikes in southern Iran, targeting missile launch sites and vessels allegedly preparing to deploy mines. Washington has justified these actions as self-defense while continuing to support ceasefire efforts.
US President Donald Trump has stated that the final agreement must be “great and meaningful,” otherwise there will be no deal. He also encouraged several Middle Eastern countries to join the Abraham Accords and normalize relations with Israel, though the proposal has reportedly met with little interest from regional leaders. Another contentious issue remains Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. While Tehran has shown willingness to temporarily lower enrichment levels, it opposes transferring its uranium stockpile abroad and is seeking the release of billions of dollars in frozen assets held overseas.
Iranian officials have argued that political divisions within the US, including criticism from Congress and sections of the Republican Party, are placing pressure on the White House and complicating the negotiations further. The proposed agreement does not currently address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its support for regional armed groups, rendering it less comprehensive than previous US demands.